# CS-41: AI answer evidence explorer

Category: AI & emerging interfaces
Level: Advanced
Suggested duration: 4–6 weeks

Original UXCharan practice scenario. Validate assumptions; do not present it as a commissioned client project.

## Problem
A hypothetical assistant mixes unsupported claims with sourced passages. Explore an answer interface that makes evidence inspectable and helps users mark uncertainty before using a response in their work.

## People to learn from
Knowledge workers checking an AI-generated research summary

## Core scope
- Ask a question
- inspect support
- flag an unsupported claim

## Research questions
- What makes an answer worth trusting?
- When do users check a source?

## Edge cases
- Source contradicts answer
- no supporting source

## Specific artefact
An evidence model and answer-review flow

## Evaluation question
Can users distinguish supported content from unverified output?

## Work to share
Problem and role; anonymised evidence; alternatives and rationale; task flow; prototype; accessibility considerations; testing findings; revisions and honest limitations.

## Request feedback
Share a viewable Figma, document or portfolio link with Saicharan on WhatsApp: https://wa.me/917093809350
Include CS-41, your name, project stage and your main feedback question. Confirm review scope, timing and any fee directly.

## Methods
- Research planning: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/plan-user-research-for-your-service
- Research consent: https://www.gov.uk/service-manual/user-research/getting-users-consent-for-research
- Design exploration: https://www.designcouncil.org.uk/resources/the-double-diamond/
- Usability testing: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/usability-testing-101/
- Accessible forms: https://www.w3.org/WAI/tutorials/forms/
- Portfolio storytelling: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/ux-design-portfolios/